Most brand protection programmes stop at monitoring. They detect a suspicious seller, flag the listing, and submit a takedown request. What they cannot do, without physical evidence, is prove what is actually being sold. That is where test buys come in.
A test buy is exactly what it sounds like. You purchase the product from a suspected seller, receive it, and examine it against your own standards. What arrives tells you far more than any digital monitoring tool can. Is it genuine? Is the packaging correct? Is the product within its expiry date? Does it carry the right barcodes, inserts, and certifications? Is it the product your brand is responsible for, or something else entirely?
Why monitoring alone is not enough
Marketplace monitoring gives you a picture of who is listing your product and at what price. It does not tell you what is in the box. A seller can appear legitimate, price competitively, and maintain positive reviews while selling products that are counterfeit, diverted, expired, or out-of-specification.
The gap between a listing and the physical product is significant. For brands in regulated categories — health, beauty, nutrition, electronics, food — that gap carries serious commercial and legal risk. A customer who receives a counterfeit or degraded product does not blame the unauthorised seller. They blame the brand.
Test buys convert suspicion into evidence. Without physical evidence, most enforcement actions stall at the platform level. With it, you have the foundation for takedown requests, legal correspondence, and distributor conversations that actually lead somewhere.
What a test buy can establish
Done properly, a test buy creates a verifiable record: when the purchase was made, from which seller, on which platform, at what price, and what arrived. The physical product provides evidence of authenticity or lack of it, packaging compliance, batch codes that can be traced back to specific distributors, and product condition. Combined, this creates an evidence package that supports action at the platform, with the seller directly, or in legal proceedings.
For brands investigating grey market activity specifically, batch code analysis is particularly valuable. It can identify exactly which authorised distributor sold the stock that ended up in an unauthorised seller's hands. That changes the conversation from enforcement to source control.
When to use test buys
Test buys are most effective when targeted, not random. The highest-value cases are sellers with consistent volume, sellers whose products generate customer complaints, sellers who have survived previous takedown attempts, and sellers operating in markets where you have strong distribution agreements and suspect a specific leak. Spending test buy budget on low-volume sellers with no enforcement history is rarely worth it.
The intelligence that comes before the test buy, knowing which sellers are doing meaningful volume and which markets they are operating in, determines whether the test buy produces useful evidence or wasted spend. That sequencing matters.
Building it into your brand protection process
Test buys work best as part of a structured process, not a one-off reaction to a specific complaint. Brands that use them effectively typically run them on a regular cadence against a priority list of sellers, maintain a documented chain of custody for every purchase, and feed the findings back into their monitoring and enforcement workflows.
The brands that recover fastest from grey market and counterfeit problems are not the ones with the most aggressive takedown programmes. They are the ones who know what is actually being sold under their name, and can prove it.
See what Lupa can find on your brand.
We will put together a sample report showing who is selling your products, at what price, and what impact it is having on your channel.
Request a sample report